Submitted by Matt Rodriguez on Thursday, April 1, 2010 - 1:40PM
Title: Clash of the Titans Genre: Action/Adventure Starring: Sam Worthington, Alexa Davalos, Danny Huston, Gemma Arterton, Pete Postelthwaite, Ralph Fiennes Liam Neeson Director: Louis Leterrier Studio: Warner Bros. Runtime: 118 minutes In Theatres: April 2, 2010 MPAA Rating: Rating: ( )Grade: C- BOTTOM LINE Greek mythology has some of the most interesting characters and it would have been so much better if the film just explored them more. Instead, we get a lackluster attempt at remaking the original. The original Clash of the Titans was a box office success when it hit theaters in 1981. Naturally, a remake would be inevitable. So once again, Perseus suits up to begin his quest to defeat the mighty Kraken which involves battling giant scorpions, retrieving Medusa’s stone-turning head, and taming the mythical Pegasus. So does the remake live up to the hype or should the classics just be left alone? The film is vastly different from the original and has been compressed to feature more action and less talking. Perseus (Sam Worthington) is living a simple fisherman lifestyle when all of a sudden Hades appears to wreak havoc on the city of Argos. It appears that they have forgotten to give praise to the gods and in retaliation, Zeus (Liam Neeson) demands that they sacrifice the king’s lovely daughter to the Kraken or be destroyed. After Perseus’ family is caught in the middle of it and is killed, he decides to lead a small group of men on a quest to defeat Hades and extract his revenge. It’ll be a dangerous journey but if anyone can do it, it’s Perseus. You see, he isn’t your average man. He’s actually the son of Zeus, ruler of Olympus. Even after coming to this realization, Perseus still has a deep hatred for the gods and what they have done. While there is some high adrenaline action in the film, you’re left with the feeling of wanting more. Perseus fights some giant scorpions, kills Medusa, and well, that’s about it. Greek mythology is known for the various gods and goddesses, and apart from Zeus and Hades, they are nowhere to be found except looming in the background. There is no ‘clash’ between humans and gods. There is no battle of epic proportions. Of course, there is the Kraken… The Kraken is one of the best aspects of the film. Its massive octopus-like body and head practically fill the entire screen, making Perseus and Pegasus appear as little dots beside it. Unfortunately, its downfall comes not from Medusa’s head but from one of the films most boasted features; 3D. There’s no easy way to put this. The 3D is some of the worst I’ve seen. Nothing pops out or immerses you in the film and it becomes blurry during quick cuts and close shots. It simply doesn’t look good. This is most likely due to the fact that the film was shot in 2D and then transferred to 3D separately. The visuals still look pretty good; they just don’t receive that added boost typical with 3D features. Clash of the Titans was a film I wanted to be spectacular in every way. Greek mythology has some of the most interesting characters and it would have been so much better if the film just explored them more. Instead, you are tossed into this story involving Perseus and his quest for revenge, something he isn’t even fully aware of. It’s a lackluster attempt at remaking the original. If you do end up seeing it, don’t waste the extra money for 3D, it’s not worth it. |
Grade It!Amazon Block 1Recent Addi(c)tionsDVD Review Friday, February 15, 2013 - 2:53PM Movie Interview Friday, February 15, 2013 - 9:53AM Amazon Block 2YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE: |
Comments
Phreaky
Cheers for the review, Matt. I am going to see this tomorrow, not in 3D. I didn't realise that the 3D was added later. Are there any other movies that have had this done that I might have seen for comparison?
Alice in Wonderland was not
Alice in Wonderland was not filmed in 3D as well but it still looked ten times better than this one.
Louis Leterier or Stephen Sommers?
Clash of the Titans was formula all the way. If you've seen The Mummy then you've definitely seen Clash of the Titans 2010. Lots of kitchen sink type one liners, action sequences that are so powerfully geared to look cool even you will film ashamed they made it to film, and CGI monsters roaming about destroying stuff. The film is of course less about sunstance the it is about trying to wow you with special effects and action. Matt, your 110% corect on the 3D aspect, completely worthless as a 3D film. People next to me were taking off their glasses and shrugging and watching the film without them only returning them to their eyes when something looked like it had to be cool in 3D. This is infact as far removed form Clash of the Titans as you can get. The trailers make you believe that it going to be some kind of 300 type film but really its just formulated after The Mummy. Dissapointing.
Thoughts
I was wanting more from the film as I watched and after it was over. I think it was a big mistake not having more dialog in it. I wasn't at all impressed with this film and considering how much I was looking forward to seeing it I think I was let down even more by how bland it was. Sure the Kraken was cool, for all of about a minute then it was over and didn't give me near enough enjoyment to make this film being worth my time and the money I spent on it. I would say it's ok for a dollar rental or just to wait for it to evenutally make it's way onto FX or USA or one of the other cable channels in the next 3 years.
That Explains a Few Things
I saw this in 3D and I couldn't agree more....don't wast the money on 3D, the effects just aren't there. There were some good effects in the movie and some unexpected humor but I have to agree it's a C-.
Post new comment